Sheet-Like Product And Method For Authenticating A Security Tag

ABSTRACT

Sheet-like product and method for authenticating a security tag including a section of the sheet-like product. The sheet-like product includes at least one security feature having optical properties that change with the viewing angle and, and at least one marker, wherein each marker is uniquely attributable to a position on the sheet-like product. The position of the at least one security feature on the sheet-like product is predetermined relative to the position of the at least one marker on the sheet-like product.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present teaching relates to a sheet-like product that can be used asa raw material for producing security tags, which when arranged onproducts or product packaging provide a means for optical authenticationof that product or packaging. Specifically, the present teaching relatesto a sheet-like product comprising: at least one security feature havingoptical properties that change with the viewing angle and at least onemarker, wherein each marker is uniquely attributable to a position onthe sheet-like product, wherein the position of the at least onesecurity feature on the sheet-like product is predetermined relative tothe position of the at least one marker on the sheet-like product. Suchsecurity tags are generally used to combat product counterfeiting bymaking forgings detectable. The present teaching further relates to amethod for determining an optical property of a partial or completesecurity feature comprised in a section of such a sheet-like product.

BACKGROUND

In WO 2015/079014 A1 a system for producing security tags has beendescribed. Basically, they are produced by cutting patches from a rawmaterial and randomly scattering those on a substrate material and/orthe object itself. The raw material feed is subject to manufacturingtolerances and the cutting and/or scattering therefore results in atruly random (stochastic) shape and distribution of the cut patches.These random properties can be used as unambiguous markings for objectsor products. The method described in WO 2013/188897 A1 exploits theseproperties and stores the random features together with an objectidentifier in a database or on the object itself (with a cryptographicsignature). This duple can later be used for visually authenticatingsuch an object marking comprising an identifier and a random featurewith a programmable device comprising a camera. However, marking of thistype is relatively expensive and additional effort is required forregistering each marking by producing a digital signature orinitializing a database.

Therefore WO 2016/034555 A1 proposes a system to register such randomsecurity features through performing a plausibility check during thefirst authentication attempt. If the plausibility check is passed, therandom features are recorded and enrolled in the database. This removesthe necessity of registering each marking by the producer in exchangefor a lower security during the first authentication attempt. Onedisadvantage of this method is that the recording of features during theauthentication attempt may be inaccurate. When such inaccurate featuresare enrolled, they may compromise later authentication attempts, whichdo not record the same inaccuracies and thus fail the authentication.

U.S. Pat. No. 6,135,355 discloses a method and system to impede thecounterfeiting of a cash card. It provides two marks, a reference markand an issuance mark, that are arranged in a distance on a card. Saiddistance and other properties of the marks (for example their shape) areencrypted and stored on a magnetic stripe of the card. The distance, theshape and the position of the marks differ from card to card. Thereference mark may be a hologram, a barcode image, a graphic image or areference hole.

EP 2 937 818 A discloses a two-dimensional marker, which in oneembodiment comprises a QR code and a hologram portion.

SUMMARY

It is an object of the present teaching to avoid some of thedisadvantages of the known methods in order to allow for small sectionsof the sheet-like product that can be used for security tags and aresuited for use in an automatic or semi-automatic visual authenticationscheme.

In order to achieve the objective mentioned above, the present teachingprovides a sheet-like product as defined in the outset, wherein thesheet-like product comprises two or more markers, wherein each markercomprises at least one member selected from a group consisting of: amachine-readable code, a human-readable code, and an identifier, andwherein each marker is uniquely identifiable. In particular both, theposition of the at least one security feature on the sheet-like productand the position of the at least one marker on the sheet-like product,may be predetermined with respect to the sheet-like product. In thiscontext “being predetermined” means that the (relative) position isfixed and known to the producer of the sheet-like product either becauseit is a mandatory result of the production process or because it isrecorded (determined) and stored after the production process prior touse of the sheet-like product (e.g., by cutting sections from it). Thesecurity feature(s) may generally be any visually detectable overtsecurity feature(s). It/They may comprise optically detectablethree-dimensional structures or materials with optical properties thatdiffer depending on the viewing angle. The security feature(s) may bearcharacteristic material-features, which can be verified by aprogrammable device. That the relative position or the position of thesecurity feature(s) and marker(s) are predetermined means that they arethe same for each copy or instance of the sheet-like product. E.g. thepositions are conditional of manufacturing of one or more sheet-likeproducts. In order to allow for small sections of the sheet-like productthat can be used for security tags, the sheet-like product comprises twoor more markers, wherein each marker is uniquely identifiable.Preferably each marker can be transformed to an identifier by aprogrammable device comprising a camera, wherein each identifier isunique on the sheet-like product. The at least one marker comprises amachine-readable code, a human-readable code and/or an identifier. Forinstance, each marker may comprise a two-dimensional bar code such as aQuick Response code, or a Data Matrix code. Such codes are optimized formachine recognition and are therefore particularly suited for use in avisual authentication scheme. A human-readable code can be used forsemi-automatic authentication, e.g. via SMS response or a telephone callservice, wherein a user submits a request comprising the human-readablecode and receives a response comprising the optical properties of one ormore associated security features. A marker that comprises a code or anidentifier can be identified independent of the position of the markeron the sheet-like product, i.e. purely based on the content of themarker. In a preferred embodiment of the present teaching, each of thetwo or more markers comprises a machine-readable code, which comprises aunique identifier.

Moreover the objective mentioned above is achieved with a method fordetermining an optical property of a partial or complete securityfeature comprised in a section of (e.g. cut from) a sheet-like productas defined above or a medium as defined below, wherein the sectioncomprises at least one marker and at least part of a security feature,the method comprising: determining the position of the partial orcomplete security feature comprised in the section relative to theposition of the at least one marker; using the determined relativeposition to retrieve the optical property of the partial or completesecurity feature from a map storing positions and optical properties ofthe security features of the sheet-like product. Determining theposition of the partial or complete security feature relative to theposition of the at least one marker includes examining the section forany included security features and markers and locating each of them todetermine the relative position(s). The map may store the positions ofthe security features relative to the marker positions; alternatively,it may store security feature and marker positions relative to a commonorigin, thus allowing for determination of relative positions.

The present teaching is an advancement to the compound or common use ofpreviously referenced art. It is based on the realization that byproviding a suitable raw material in the form of the present sheet-likeproduct, information on the properties of the security feature(s)available during production may be used for accessing those properties(e.g. for enrollment and/or verification). In order to access thatinformation, it may be linked to the security feature. That link shouldwithstand the randomization process (e.g. cutting sections from the rawmaterial). It must also be secure, i.e. not easy to forge, or otherwisethe validity of a verification based on it is at risk. The presentteaching proposes the use of at least one marker on the sheet-likeproduct, wherein the marker and its position relative to the securityfeature can be used as the link mentioned above, i.e. to accesspreviously available information on the properties of the securityfeature(s). The number, size and distribution of markers on thesheet-like product can be adapted accordingly for withstanding therandomization process, i.e. such that every section comprises at leastone marker. The marker should be visually detectable, such that it canbe recognized by a programmable device comprising a camera. In order toprovide an unambiguous link, the marker should be uniquely attributableto a position on the sheet-like product. With this information andpresuming that the position of the security feature(s) on the sheet-likeproduct is predetermined relative to the position of the marker(s), asecurity feature on the same section as a marker is linked to the markervia its relative position.

Correspondingly the present method may for determining the position ofthe at least one marker (i.e. to which the marker is attributed)comprise: identifying the at least one marker and retrieving the opticalproperty of the partial or complete security feature from the map basedon the identity of the at least one marker and the position of thepartial or complete security feature relative to the identified marker.In that way a disambiguation between two or more markers of thesheet-like product can be performed.

Each marker may advantageously comprise an encoded identifier, whereinthe encoding of the encoded identifier comprises information for errordetection or error correction. Thus when the marker is read out,error-correction or error-detection methods may be applied in order toreliably determine the content and/or identity of the marker.

Alternatively or additionally, the marker may comprise an encoding ofthe optical properties of at least one adjacent security featureidentified by its position relative to the marker. Thereby the markermay directly store the optical properties of the adjacent partial orcomplete security feature. In this embodiment, the map that can be usedin the inventive method as described above, which map stores (in thiscase relative) positions and optical properties of the securityfeatures, is directly embedded within the sheet-like product itself. Themethod for authentication of a resulting security tag can thereforeoperate in a distributed way, i.e. not limited to situations where acentrally stored map can be accessed (e.g. via an available internetconnection).

It has turned out particularly useful that the at least one securityfeature overlaps with the at least one marker or is part of the at leastone marker. In this case the marker and the security feature can belocated in overlapping areas on the surface of the sheet-like product.This decreases the chance of obtaining sections without both a markerand a security feature (such sections cannot benefit from the presentteaching) when randomly cutting the sheet-like product. One example forsuch an overlap would be that each black dot in a marker comprises asecurity feature. In this case the security features hardly interferewith the read out of the marker.

Different types of security features can benefit from the advantages ofthe present teaching. Preferably the at least one security featurecomprises an optical variable device (brief “OVD”). An OVD isessentially an iridescent image that exhibits various optical effectssuch as movement or color changes when regarded from different viewingangles.

In a preferred embodiment, the at least one security feature comprisestwo or more optical variable devices placed side by side, wherein thetwo or more optical variable devices have different optical properties(e.g. different diffraction starting angles). The arrangement of OVDsside by side or adjacent one another has the advantage that the viewingangle is the same at least at the border between them. Thus the presenceof the security feature can be easily recognized and verified with aprogrammable device comprising a camera through ensuring that the twoOVDs appear differently.

The sheet-like product according may be a sheeting or a film. In thiscase it can be processed easily, including storage, transport andcutting. More particularly, the sheet-like product may be a holographicsheet or a holographic film which can be processed by standard printingmeans, e.g. cold- or hot-foiling, over-printing or thermo-transfer.

Furthermore the present teaching also foresees a medium (e.g. asubstrate) comprising two or more sheet-like products as defined abovearranged in a tiled manner. In this way a larger number of sheet-likeproducts can be provided efficiently. The markers are unique within onesheet-like product, i.e. one tile or period of the arrangement making upthe medium, but repeat in a periodic manner. In order to resolveambiguities during read-out of the marker, boundary conditions (i.e.tile edges) may be considered and accounted for.

In a preferred variant of the present method, it may be foreseen tolocate a reference mark of the section and to use the determinedposition of the reference mark together with the determined position ofthe marker to retrieve the optical property of a partial or completesecurity feature comprised in the section. Thus the information of themarker is complemented by the information of the reference mark andtheir relative arrangement in order to access information concerning apresent security feature.

Specifically, a boundary of the section (or patch) can be used as thereference mark. Together with the knowledge about the position of themarker, the boundary or edge of the section of the sheet-like productallows to determine which security features are to be expected withinsaid boundary. Thus it allows to reliably identify missing securityfeatures in addition to security features having incorrect opticalproperties.

In a preferred embodiment, the offset between the at least one markerand the reference mark is subject to manufacturing tolerances and cantherefore be used as a random security feature. The random securityfeature can be used as an authentication feature of a security tagproduced from the sheet-like product.

Finally the present teaching concerns an application as a method forauthenticating (i.e. verifying the authenticity of) a security tagcomprising a section of a sheet-like product or medium as defined above,the method comprising: determining an optical property of a partial orcomplete security feature comprised in said section according to themethod steps described previously, determining an optical property ofthe partial or complete security feature comprised in said section usingat least one image sensor, comparing the determined optical properties,and confirming the authenticity of the security tag if the comparedoptical properties are in agreement. With this method sectionsoriginating from the sheet-like product can be confirmed andauthenticated by verifying that the actually present security/materialfeatures correspond to the predetermined information from the productionof the sheet-like product.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

In the following, the present teaching will be explained further bymeans of particularly preferred embodiments to which it is not to berestricted, though, and with reference to the drawings. The drawingsshow in detail:

FIG. 1 schematically a view of one side of a sheet-like productaccording to the present teaching;

FIG. 2 a detailed view of a section cut out of the sheet-like productaccording to FIG. 1; and

FIG. 3 a medium comprising a tiled arrangement of multiple sheet-likeproducts according to FIG. 1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

FIG. 1 shows a sheet-like product 1 forming a raw material, e.g. asheeting, a film or a foil, or being part thereof. The sheet-likeproduct 1 comprises twenty-eight security features 2 having opticalproperties that change with the viewing angle. The sheet-like product 1also comprises twenty-eight markers 3. In this example the securityfeatures 2 and markers are arranged in a grid in an alternating manner.However in different embodiments the security features 2 may alsooverlap with the markers 3 or be part of the markers 3.

Each marker 3 is uniquely identifiable and uniquely attributable to aposition on the sheet-like product 1. Each marker 3 should be readableby a programmable device comprising a camera (e.g. a smartphone ortablet). The markers 3 in this example are two-dimensional codescomprising an encoded identifier. Of course any codes similar to common1D or 2D barcodes, i.e. Data Matrices, can be used for the markers 3.Each encoded identifier is unique across the sheet-like product 1, i.e.for each marker 3. The encoding of the encoded identifier comprisesinformation for error detection or error correction, e.g. for usingencoding strategies which employ error-corrective codes (ECC), e.g.Reed-Solomon. The use of such codes aids robust/reliable decoding andfurthermore ensures that if a marker 3 is decoded, it has the correctcontent. There is therefore a close to 100% probability that if a marker3 is decoded, the identifier resulting from the decoding is correct,i.e. it is equal to the identifier encoded during production or designof the sheet-like product 1.

Each security feature 2 comprises two or more optical variable devices4, 5 placed in an adjacent manner (e.g. side by side). The two or moreoptical variable devices (OVDs) 4, 5 can either have distinct opticalcharacteristic or share the same principal optical characteristics buthave different diffraction starting angles and therefore appeardifferently from any one viewing angle, which is indicated by differentshades in FIG. 1. FIG. 1 shows an example of a security featurecomprising two different OVDs. For simplicity we will subsequently useexamples referring to so-structured security features with two OVDs. Allexamples can trivially be extend to security features comprisingmultiple OVDs. For evaluation with a programmable device's camera we canindependently look at the OVD left 5 and the OVD right 4 within asecurity feature 2 and examine differences in their appearance. If theyare not differing or show unexpected behavior, verification fails and wecan hence conclude that somebody tried to tamper the security tag, e.g.a plausibility check fails and the enrollment is interrupted. To providethe optical variable devices, the sheet-like product 1 may be aholographic sheet or a holographic film. The positions of the securityfeatures 2 on the sheet-like product 1 are predetermined relative to thepositions of the markers 3 on the sheet-like product 1.

Furthermore, preferably in a controlled environment, the iridescenteffects of the OVD left 5 and the OVD right 4 can be used to determinetheir characteristics and optical properties. As they can so beattributed to distinct characteristics, we can discriminate amongdifferent types of security features, e.g. between differentstarting-angle combinations of the left 5 and right 4 OVD within asecurity feature 2.

The sheet-like product 1 is designed as a raw material for producingsecurity elements or tags for marking and authenticating products. Suchauthentication can rely on verifying the presence and properties ofsecurity features, which are relatively difficult to copy. A preferreduse of the sheet-like product 1 thus is to cut sections 6 out of thesheet-like product 1 and use the resulting sections 6 in securityelements for product marking. The advantages of such use become apparentin a method for determining an optical property of a partial or completesecurity feature comprised in a section 6 of the sheet-like product 1shown in FIG. 2. This method can preferably be performed by aprogrammable device comprising an optical sensor, e.g. a smartphone or adedicated scanner.

The section 6 comprises at least one complete marker 7 and parts ofmultiple security features 8. When performing the method, first theposition of one of the partial or complete security feature 8 comprisedin the section 6 is determined relative to the position of the marker 7.Then the determined relative position is used to retrieve the opticalproperty of the partial or complete security feature 8 from a map (notshown) storing positions and optical properties of all the securityfeatures 2 of the sheet-like product 1. In particular the marker 7 isfirst identified and the optical property of the partial or completesecurity feature 8 is retrieved from the map based on the identity ofthe marker 7 and the position of the partial or complete securityfeature 8 relative to the identified marker 7. Additionally, a referencemark of the section 6, e.g. the boundary 9 of the section 6, may firstbe located and the determined position of the reference mark may be usedtogether with the determined relative position of the security feature 8and the identity of the marker 7 to retrieve the optical properties of apartial or complete security feature 8 from the map.

A preferred application of the above method is for authenticating asecurity tag comprising a section 6 of a sheet-like product 1. Theauthentication includes additional steps that can be performed on theprogrammable device. On the one hand the optical properties of thepartial or complete security feature 8 comprised in the section 6 aredetermined as described above, i.e. by accessing prior knowledge of theoptical properties. On the other hand the optical properties of thepartial or complete security feature 8 comprised in said section 6 aredetermined using at least one image sensor, i.e. essentially byperforming a measurement. Then the determined optical properties arecompared and the authenticity of the security tag is confirmed if thecompared optical properties are in agreement.

For enrolling an association between a product identifier (e.g. serialnumber) and a security tag comprising a random security feature such asa random section 6, the security feature or its optical properties firstneed to be detected. The detection of such features is described in moredetail in WO 2013/188897 A1. The enrollment procedure is described inmore detail in WO 2016/034555 A1. It is well known that detection ofsecurity features such as those formed with optically diffractivedevices, holographic foils or other OVDs, is prone to misdetections andinaccuracies. Consequently it may happen that a misdetection of asecurity feature is significantly off its true value. Enrolling such amisdetected security feature consequently may lead to false decisions inlater authentication attempts.

With the present teaching an image of a section 6 cut from thesheet-like product 1 is captured, which contains at least one marker 7and one security feature 8 which has typical characteristics for thesecurity material and resulting optical properties that change with theviewing angle. The marker 7 can be detected and the identifier retrievedfrom the marker 7 with close to 100% certainty correct. The programmabledevice comprising a camera can be configured to also detect the positionX′, Y′ of the marker 7 within the section 6 relative to a referencemark, which could but doesn't have to be the boundary 9 of the section6, its center point or a similar property.

The producer who produces the raw material comprising the sheet-likeproduct 1 naturally has exhaustive knowledge on its structure andproperties, i.e. knows all markers 3, their absolute locations x, y andthe characteristic material features and optical properties of allsecurity features 2. Alternatively the producer produces a random foilinvolving stochastic processes and after production uses a camera toextract the marker positions and optical properties of the producedsecurity features etc. (hence building up the exhaustive knowledge).This has the benefit of randomly generating different instances of theraw material. Using the identifier decoded from the marker 7 of asection 6 together with the relative marker position X′, Y′ within thesection 6 and the known absolute location x, y of the marker 7, theexact stamping position xp, yp of the section 6 can be determined.

By knowing the stamping or cutting position xp, yp and the dimensions ofthe section 6, the exhaustive knowledge on the sheet-like product 1,which can be stored in a map, can be used to look up the opticalproperties of the security features 8 comprised in the section 6. Theseoptical properties can then be used for an improved (and hence moresecure) plausibility check in an enrollment and registration proceduresuch as the one disclosed in WO 2016/034555 A1, i.e. for enrolling theoptical properties of a security tag (comprising the section 6) inassociation with a unique product identifier (e.g. a serial number)applied to the product together with the security tag.

The cutting position xp, yp of the section 6 is preferably random due tomanufacturing tolerances or by intentionally introduced stochasticprocesses (like feeding the raw material to a cutter etc.). It cantherefore be used as an additional random feature in a product markingbased authentication system, such as the one introduced in WO2013/188897 A1. Even more so, the information on the optical propertiesof the security features 2 may be used to confirm that the section 6indeed originates from an authentic raw material, i.e. comprising anauthentic sheet-like product 1.

FIG. 3 shows a medium 10 according to the present teaching, wheremultiple sheet-like products 3 are arranged in a tiled manner, such thatthe medium 10 can be used as a raw material for producing security tagsas described above.

1-13. (canceled)
 14. A sheet-like product comprising: at least onesecurity feature having optical properties that change with the viewingangle, and two or more different markers at different positions of thesheet-like product, wherein each marker comprises a machine-readablecode, wherein the two or more different markers are independent of theviewing angle, wherein a position of the at least one security featureon the sheet-like product is predetermined relative to the positions ofthe two or more different markers on the sheet-like product.
 15. Thesheet-like product according to claim 14, wherein each marker comprisesexactly one machine-readable code and wherein the machine-readable codeof each marker is independent of the viewing angle.
 16. The sheet-likeproduct according to claim 14, wherein each marker is uniquelyattributable to a position on the sheet-like product.
 17. The sheet-likeproduct according to claim 16, wherein each marker is uniquelyidentifiable.
 18. The sheet-like product according to claim 14, whereineach marker includes an encoded identifier, wherein the encoding of theencoded identifier includes information for error detection or errorcorrection.
 19. The sheet-like product according to claim 14, whereinthe marker includes an encoding of optical properties of at least oneadjacent security feature identified by its position relative to themarker.
 20. The sheet-like product according to claim 14, wherein the atleast one security feature overlaps with the at least one marker or ispart of the at least one marker.
 21. The sheet-like product according toclaim 14, wherein the at least one security feature has an opticalvariable device.
 22. The sheet-like product according to claim 21,wherein the at least one security feature has two or more opticalvariable devices placed side by side, wherein the two or more opticalvariable devices have different optical properties.
 23. The sheet-likeproduct according to claim 14, wherein the sheet-like product is asheeting or a film.
 24. The sheet-like product according to claim 23,wherein the sheet-like product comprises a holographic sheet or aholographic film.
 25. A security tag, comprising the sheet-like productaccording to claim
 24. 26. A sheet-like product, comprising: a securityfeature having physical optical properties that change with the viewingangle; two markers at different positions of the sheet-like product,each having a unique machine-readable code; wherein the two or moredifferent markers are independent of the viewing angle; wherein aposition of the security feature is predefined relative to the differentpositions of the two markers such that expected optical properties ofthe security feature can be determined based on the machine-readablecode of one of the two markers.
 27. A security tag, comprising thesheet-like product according to claim
 26. 28. The security tag accordingto claim 27, wherein the security feature comprises two or more opticalvariable devices placed side by side, each having different opticalproperties.
 29. The security tag according to claim 27, wherein the oneof the two markers includes an encoding of the expected opticalproperties of the security feature.
 30. A sheet-like product comprising:at least one security feature having optical properties that change withthe viewing angle, and two or more different markers at differentpositions of the sheet-like product, wherein each marker comprises amachine-readable code, wherein at least one adjacent security feature isarranged adjacent to at least one of the two or more different markers,wherein a position of the at least one security feature on thesheet-like product is predetermined relative to the positions of the twoor more different markers on the sheet-like product.
 31. The sheet-likeproduct according to claim 30, wherein the machine-readable code of eachmarker encodes optical properties of the at least one adjacent securityfeature identified by its position relative to the marker.
 32. Thesheet-like product according to claim 30, wherein the machine-readablecode of each marker comprises an identifier, wherein the identifieruniquely identifies optical properties of the at least one adjacentsecurity feature.
 33. The sheet-like product according to claim 30,wherein the two or more different markers are independent of the viewingangle.
 34. A security tag, comprising the sheet-like product accordingto claim 30.